It starts describing the experience of Susan Mule, a home school mom, and her daughter Elizabeth:
Home-school mom Susan Mule wishes she hadn't taken a friend's advice and tried a textbook from a popular Christian publisher for her 10-year-old's biology lessons.
Mule's precocious daughter Elizabeth excels at science and has been studying tarantulas since she was 5. But she watched Elizabeth's excitement turn to confusion when they reached the evolution section of the book from Apologia Educational Ministries, which disputed Charles Darwin's theory.
"I thought she was going to have a coronary," Mule said of her daughter, who is now 16 and taking college courses in Houston. "She's like, 'This is not true!'"
The article makes it seem as though Susan and her daughter are victims of a hate crime because their ideas on biology were not taught in these books. If they have such a strong faith in evolution, you would think she would put forth more effort to know what text she was using before she used it. How ridiculous is it for her to get mad at the publishers for what they printed in their biology curriculum, when she obviously didn't take the time to preview it to be sure it fit her worldview.
It gets better though. Apparently home-schooling families that do not subscribe to a creation worldview feel "Isolated and frustrated". Many home-schooling families using these text can empathize with this feeling since that is what drove them to home-school in the first place. You see, in public school (and many private schools) a creationist worldview is considered disallowable because it is associated with the Bible. Despite a lack of substantive proof for the theory of evolution and much evidence supporting creation, the politically correct cult of public education insists on pushing it's agenda that science must never have anything in common with Christianity (or in this case Judaism and Islam as well).
Next they accused the two best selling biology textbooks of stacking the deck against evolution. They even quote a scientist (or at least a professor of ecology and evolution at the University of Chicago...I am sure he is not at all biased), who said, "I feel fairly strongly about this. These books are promulgating lies to kids." Well notice he talks about how he feels, but doesn't mention what even one of these so called lies might be. He must think that it is enough that he is a scientist saying so, because, you know, scientist never lie (especially about science like Global Warming).
Skip a few paragraphs and you are introduced to Mia Perry (aka Mia-Like-to-Whine-a-Lot) another home-school mom being discriminated against by the free market.
Here is her story:
In Kentucky, Lexington home-schooler Mia Perry remembers feeling disheartened while flipping through a home-school curriculum catalog and finding so many religious-themed textbooks.So what is next, an article about how disheartened Mia was when she looked through a menu at her local Jewish deli only to find only Kosher foods?
"We're not religious home-schoolers, and there's somewhat of a feeling of being outnumbered," said Perry, who has home-schooled three of her four children after removing her oldest child from a public school because of a health condition.
Perry said she cobbled together her own curriculum after some mainstream publishers told her they would not sell directly to home-schooling parents.
Jerry Coyne (the unbiased Prof. from Chicago) is now joined by Duncan Porter, a biology professor from Virginia Tech, in revealing this crisis of blasphemy against the faith of evolution, giving the 10th grade biology text from Apologia and Bob Jones an F. The open minded Coyne chimes in again saying, "If this is the way kids are home-schooled then they're being shortchanged, both rationally and in terms of biology." He is worried that deceiving naive home-schooled students with these lies will steer them away from careers in biology or the study of the earth.
Adam Browns parents disagree:
Adam Brown's parents say their 16-year-old son's belief in the Bible's creation story isn't deterring him from pursuing a career in marine biology. His parents, Ken and Polly Brown, taught him at their Cedar Grove, Ind., home using the Apologia curriculum and other science texts.You see, Adam, and many other home-schoolers are taught both theories, unlike most public schooler who are taught only evolution. It seems that public education and many "scientists" are more interested in dictating what science is, instead of observing and letting the truth be revealed.
Polly Brown said her son would gladly take college courses that include evolution, and he'll be able to provide the expected answers even though he disagrees.
"He probably knows it better than the kids who have been taught evolution all through public school," Polly Brown said. "But that is in order for him to understand both sides of that argument because he will face it throughout his higher education."
Public schools are state and/or federally run. Home school texts are made and sold by independent companies. What?!?! The government dictating information? They're controlling what people know and what they can learn? Say it ain't so!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt really sounds like whoever wrote the AP article is building a case for censorship of homeschoolers' textbooks...particularly when you look at the comments and blog posts that have been generated by the article.
ReplyDeleteWho are these people...Susan Mule, Mia Perry, and Wendy Womack...and how did their stories bubble to the surface?
Oh but you see DtC, it is the government's job to make sure that private companies do not produce material that might encourage people to think for themselves. As we all, know, the government now thinks for us!
ReplyDelete“Would that it were that easy! True, there are religious scientists and Darwinian churchgoers. But this does not mean that faith and science are compatible, except in the trivial sense that both attitudes can be simultaneously embraced by a single human mind. (It is like saying that marriage and adultery are compatible because some married people are adulterers. )"
ReplyDelete-Jerry A. Coyne
Where does Jerry get the ideas of marriage and adultery, I wonder? Are these a result of empirical science?
ReplyDeleteHe wants Congress to establish his religion and dis-establish Christianity.
What they are building is a case for a fairness doctrine for home-school curriculum. This will ultimately lead to forbidding anything being taught outside of the government approved agenda (which most definately will not tolerate any Christian ideas).
ReplyDeleteScience and truth SHOULD ALWAYS be compatible, and where faith leads to truth, it is compatible with science that rightly does the same. The issue comes when "science" attempts to prove an agenda instead of attempting to discover the truth through unbias observation.